Reviews

The World’s Best Audiophile Linear Power Supplies

Shanti Dual Linear Ultra Low Noise PSU

Price: $159 (Dual rail)

Product link

About

Our Shanti uses an R core transformer. In the output stage, we used a discrete design that, unlike an low-dropout (LDO) regulator, has a very fast transient time. The last component, we have a supercapacitor. In fact, you are listening to the supercap reservoir of electrons. It can supply 3A of power for a few milliseconds.

The noise of Shanti is 700nV (0.7uV) at full power (measured with Audio Precision )

Music and linear power supply have been always a good match. The main problems of LPS is extremely inflated pricing and no data.

Using a transformer will not automatically give you a better PSU. Worst is that most of manufacturers include no testing… no data that can help chose one. We mean to change that.

First, we started with the transformer. There are many types of transformers, some are worse than others (noise coupling, electromagnetic interference). We chose one of the best transformers for noise and emi, r-core.

The transformer has a dual output (galvanically isolated) 5.2V 3A and 5.2V at 1.2A so you can power multiple devices (RPI 4, 3 + DAC, Katana, BOSS, or other) and we used independent (of course since they are isolated) filtering on each rail. First a capacitance bank (massive) to reduce the 50/60Hz noise, then an active filter, followed by an LDO to keep voltage stable. Since LDOs have poor transient and impedance, we used a last active filter (with good transient) and then capacitors more than 15.000uF but most importantly, super capacitors on the output. Final power comes in fact from super caps… transients and impedance of the LPS is… very good.

At last, Shanti includes AC line filter and AC side is earthed to casing. A few words on what we achieved. Measuring noise (in real word scenario) we see about 80nV (0.08uV of noise from 0-20Khz) at the floor of our AP machine. This is comparable to batteries from our internal testing.

As explained, Shanti is not only shining because of the ultra-low differential noise and common mode noise, but because of incredible low impedance / deep reservoir of electrons at the output of the PSU.

Build & Specifications

  • Dual output (galvanically isolated) 5.2V 3A and 5.2V at 1.2A
  • Power multiple devices (RPI 4, 3 + DAC, Katana, BOSS, or other)
  • Independent filtering on each rail
  • Super capacitors on the output
  • Incredible low impedance / deep reservoir of electrons at the output of the PSU
  • Includes multiple adaptors

Overview

The Shanti is the most affordable linear power supply on this list. And you’ll get TWO outputs to boot. Sweet!

This is strictly a value-oriented power supply. At $80 a rail, it’s a no-brainer if you’re looking to step up from a wall wart SMPS. It doesn’t hold a candle to the performance of these other high-end power supplies – but isn’t expected to. It just does a little bit of everything. But is impressively quiet.

The Sound

I’ll go ahead and say it. For the money, the Shanti performs very well. Especially in detail, imaging, and soundstage width. It’s also surprisingly quiet and lightfooted. Although its ability to articulate is on the looser side (a little rougher). With acoustic and soft rock, it’s able to keep pace. But when the tracks get busy, the imaging does get smeared. Otherwise, it does well with precise focus.

During my listen, I kept thinking “It’s not bad for the money.” It has good brilliance, fun energy, and pretty resolving of lower-level details. If you’re willing to exchange a warmer sound for something with more hype and excitement, the Shanti is a good choice.

Tradeoff

Compared to the other much pricier power supplies on this list, it doesn’t do a great job with delineation, separation, or depth. It’s a more gentle and dimensionally flat sound and isn’t particularly snappy. It doesn’t have a ton of sparkle or detail either. But it isn’t harsh or overly smooth. It’s just a clean, cool-neutral, and “simple-sounding” power supply.

The Shanti isn’t the most textural or full-bodied. It doesn’t have a lot of solidity or smoothness. The midrange has a bit of grain but has plenty of inner resolution. So there is a bit of dissonance but it’s expected at this price point.

By far, the worst quality of this power supply is bass. Lower octaves were eviscerated. It comes off a bit “splatty” and fettered. You’re going to have to find bass elsewhere.

Who Should Buy the Shanti Dual Linear Ultra-Low Noise PSU?

If you’re on a budget, the Shanti is a great option and will sound better than your stock power supply. It doesn’t try to promote any special effects but instead offers a clean and non-fatiguing listening experience. It’s also very quiet. Not to mention, it comes with a ton of useful adapters.

But if you’re aiming for top-grade sound, I would save up and go for others on this list. Keep in mind, you’ll be paying at least triple for a single rail.

Pros

Cons

  • Good bang for buck. Especially for two outputs.

  • Good soundstage and imaging

  • Detailed and good midrange clarity

  • Suprisingly quiet background. Especiallyl for the price.

  • Articulation is a bit more lazy

  • A cooler tone

  • A rougher sound, especially when it gets busy

  • Bass is very light


Comparisons

vs. SBooster BOTW P&P ECO MkII

  • The Shanti is much cooler sounding
  • Shanti has more vibrance and air over the SBooster. Imagine more stringy guitars.
  • SBooster has better bass, tone, and delineation.
  • Shanti has better focus and dynamic energy. It’s technically better.
  • SBooster has a smoother midrange
  • Shanti is quieter
  • If you want a more organic sound, go with the SBooster. If you want more clarity, go with the Shanti.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Jay Luong

Mr. Audio Bacon himself. An open-minded electrical engineer and software developer by trade. I have an obsession with the enjoyment of all things media - specifically in the realm of music and film. So much heart and soul (and money) go into the creation of this artistry. My aim is to find out which products get me closer to what the musicians and directors intended.

View Comments

  • Well Jay, you have only just gone and done it again. Another mammoth review. Don’t you ever sleep!?

    As a Dave owner I was lucky to obtain the first production version of Sean Jacobs DC4 and have been using that ever since with a big grin on my face every time I use the Dave. It has possibly been the biggest improvement to the sound of my system (with the possible and honourable exception of my own Wave High Fidelity STORM dual BNC cables of course!).

    However all of that is about to change because Sean has been kind enough to loan me a prototype of his new ARC6 version of the DC4 power supply. Having had the Dave all this time I was not aware of any deficiencies. That was until I plugged in the ARC6. As you say in your review the DC4 is a master at revealing the texture of instruments but now the ARC6 version has a transient speed to go with that textural information. It is a quite uncanny combination. The bass is also deeper and more powerful and yet manages to more detail and information in it at the same time.

    You will gather that I like the ARC6 upgrade to the DC4 for the Dave. It is a huge upgrade to the Dc4. I understand that existing owners of the DC4 can have theirs upgraded to the ARC6 version by returning to Sean or to one of his agents in the USA or EU.

    But that is not really why I was minded to put pen to paper in response to your review. A few months ago I did my own private shoot out of power supplies powering the Qutest. These included the Sbooster with Ultra Mk2 upgrade, Farad Super3, Allo Shanti, MCRU, Sean Jacobs DC3, PowerAdd battery, iFi, a cheap LPS from China and of course, because I could, the 5V rail from a DC4. Broadly I agree with all your comments and in the end I used the Farad Super3, not because it was the best but because it was a reasonable amount of money to spend for the performance gain with a Qutest. One thing to say about the value for money Allo Shanti is that if one has the necessary skills it takes a leap forward in sound quality if the supplied captive leads are removed from the circuit board and GX16 sockets are installed allowing after market DC leads.

    I have more recently listened again to a DC4 powering the Qutest and although first time around I rejected the idea of a single rail £4,000 DC4 powering a £1.200 Qutest as being any where near a sensible decision I have now begun to wonder whether in fact it brings the £5,200 combination up to a level of similarly priced DACs and I think it might just do that. Such is the benefit of the DC4 with a Qutest.

    So, thanks once again for the huge undertaking and it is nice of course to see you still using my WAVE STREAM cables with your Dave. 👍

    Nick.

    • I would be curious to hear the ARC6! Is there a tonal color difference between DC4 and ARC6? More shine?

      I agree, the Farad Super3 is a great value, especially if you enjoy that more liquid and smooth sound. From memory, I thought the Mojo Illuminati V3 paired well with the Qutest. And I could definitely hear the potential of the Shanti, the price is incredible for its performance (but critical listeners won't be happy). GX16 sockets with custom cabling would be interesting.

      Have you tried batteries?

  • I run my RME ADI-2 fs DAC and streamer on pure LiFePo4 cells (without any battery management electronics of course). The DAC uses 4*3.2V 20AH cells in series, and the streamer 2 of the same in series. The batteries last more than a day so I charge at night when sleeping.

    It would be interesting to know how batteries like these compares to the better power supplies.

    • Yeah, I was thinking about including batteries as well. Which specific ones would you like to see?

      • I think the more "pure" cells you use the better, and not small AA or similar batteries. Here is the ones I use:
        https://shop.gwl.eu/LiFePO4-cells-3-2-V/LiFePO4-High-Power-Cell-3-2V-20Ah-Alu-case-CE.html

        Of if you want one ready made for RME DAC, this one works (its just 4 cells in series), should be similar available in NA if that's where you live: https://shop.gwl.eu/LiFeYPO4-batteries-12V-1-1/Lithium-Battery-LiFePO4-12V-20Ah.html

        But basically you want low internal resistance in combination with pure cells. For example, a power pack used for mobile phones sounds a lot worse (they have switched DC regulators inside to get to 5V).

        It also important to stay away from "battery management", even if you risk damaging the cells if overcharged or undercharged. Those battery managements are filled with switched cheap electronic.

        I then have 18 awg OCC coppar cables with cotton sleeves as only insulation, soldered to a DC connector of copper.

          • Yes, it is. I like the sound of my LiFePO4 batteries though, and LPS manufacturers often use batteries like those as "reference" to compare with (or so I have heard).

            It's also worth mentioning that Stromtank (a really expensive HiFi power gear) uses LiFePo4 cells for their "magic", but enough of them to also drive power amplifiers.

    • Not even a Contact Us email address. Doesn't infuse confidence unless you're inside Australi and can call them.

  • great work - thanks a million!!

    comment to the Sbooster PSU: i kind of relate to your findings (using mk 1 version), adding (now unavailable) Padis fuse and Furutech Absolute Power adds LIVE to it. yet, possibly also to all other PSUs tested here

  • Hi there,
    I know you cannot review everything under the sun, but I’ll selfishly propose you review the ISOL-8 Prometheus LPSU. Their power conditioners are great and I would be curious to see how their power supply compares with the others.

    Amazing amazing review; very well done! Thank you!

  • My Farad Super 3 is custom modified, but I think it performs very well. Along w/ Jay I am factoring in price and its incredibly diminutive size.

    I am also curious about the remarks in comparison to other PSUs, which cable was used: silver or copper?

    • Listening was primarily done with the copper cable. Still great for the price, especially if you enjoy a full bodied and smooth sound.

Recent Posts

HQPlayer – Better Than $5,000 Upscaler?

I received many emails requesting a review of HQPlayer: A $260 piece of software that… Read More

3 years ago

THE HIGH END® 2021 IS NOW FULLY BOOKED!

The organizer is delighted about the strong exhibitor interest in the world’s leading audio trade… Read More

3 years ago

Spotify HiFi – Lossless Streaming Goodness

This might be concern for other lossless streaming services. Mostly because Spotify's curation and… Read More

3 years ago

The Passionate Audiophile – From Robot to Human

2020 was whirlwind of a year. But it was an opportunity for self-reflection. Rather… Read More

3 years ago

$3,000 Meze Empyrean Headphones Review

Now I've heard the Meze Empyrean headphones probably dozen times at the shows. And… Read More

3 years ago

$62,000 Sonus Faber Il Cremonese ex3me – Absolute Neutrality

22nd September 2020, Vicenza, Italy: Sonus faber has launched the Il Cremonese ex3me, tech-rich… Read More

4 years ago

This website uses cookies.