Reviews

The World’s Best Audiophile Linear Power Supplies

UpTone Audio JS-2

Price: $925 (dual output)

Product

About UpTone Audio

Our mission is to keep introducing affordable audio components and accessories that produce clearly audible improvements in fine music systems. [UpTone will never sell audio “snake oil.”  The engineering and sonic effects must be real, otherwise we won’t bother.] Our goal is to grow and conduct our business with personal and professional integrity, and to enjoy interaction with audiophiles worldwide.

I, Alex Crespi, am the sole owner of UpTone Audio and I coordinate all product design, production, and operations. The circuits of UpTone Audio products are engineered by John Swenson, and we work closely together on a range of groundbreaking projects. I have known John for almost 17 years, and feel privileged to be able to work with him, to co-create and produce products from his inspired circuits and concepts, and to count this brilliant man as my dear friend.

John Swenson on the benefits of a choke-filtered linear power supply:

The traditional cap only filter (transformer, diode bridge, big cap) produces raw DC with a sawtooth riding on top. That sawtooth produces lots of high frequency components that the regulator has to deal with. Traditional regulators do very well at low frequencies, but have lousy characteristics at high frequencies which means a fair amount of those high frequency components from the cap-only filter get through to the regulator. Fancy discrete regulators do well at blocking the high frequency components, but add cost and complexity to a PS. Our approach is to use a properly designed choke-based supply whose ripple is a perfect sine wave, no high frequency components, thus a traditional regulator works very well. The discrete regulator is not needed to deal with the high frequency components, since there aren’t any.

All diode types except Schottkys emit a burst of ultrasonic noise as they turn off. This noise can go forward into the load circuit AND it can go back into the AC line, and it can also excite the transformer resonance. The “slow” diodes still have this ultrasonic noise. Schottkys are the only type which do not have this noise. Schottkys also usually have about half the voltage drop of other diode types and are usually faster. Which type to use depends a lot on what your supply looks like and what you are trying to optimize for. 


With a traditional low voltage design with a large cap right after a bridge you get large current spikes, these produce a large amount of high frequency noise which needs to be filtered by what comes after the cap. In this type of circuit the slow diodes can help cut down on the extent of the high frequencies generated by the sharp high current pulse. BUT they still generate the ultrasonic noise.

This is another reason why we like to use the choke-based design. With the choke there is no steep high current pulse, so no disadvantage to Schottky diodes. You get the advantage of no ultrasonic noise, lower voltage drop (so lower power consumption in the diode) and no big massive current pulses.

Build & Specifications

Superficially, the UpTone Audio JS-2 is probably the most sumptuous power supply in this review. Compared to the other power supplies, I personally prefer the look of this one with the subtle orange LED. But it’s not only aesthetically pleasing, it feels well built and robust.

  • The JS-2 is capable of continuous current output (from either rail) of:4.3A at 5V, 5.5A at 7V6.8A at 9V7.4A at 12VThose maximums are reduced when both independently-regulated outputs are used simultaneously, depending on voltage setting and loads at each.
  • Upon special request (at no extra charge) we can provision the DC2 output rail to have a 15V setting (client chooses which stock setting, 5/7/9/12V to trade away for the 15V setting). At 15V the JS-2 can deliver 4.4A.
  • Wait time for someone ordering a JS-2 is always only 1-3 weeks (quoted at time of order) as we consistently build 25 units every 6 weeks. There are now more than 1,000 JS-2 units in the field worldwide and it is incredibly robust and reliable.
  • The JS-2 at $925 comes “free” with one of our custom 1.5m Oyaide/Belden 15awg shielded, star-quad DC cables–always with 5.5mm x 2.5mm plug at the power supply end, and client choice of 5.5mm x 2.5mm or 5.5mm x 2.1mm at the device end. A second cable can be included for $75 more—again with choice of device end plug size (but always 1.5m length).
  • Dual-output, choke-filtered linear power supply with four user-selectable DC output voltages.
  • Guaranteed current capability is 5 amps continuous from either output at any voltage setting.  Up to 7.0 amps split between outputs, depending upon DC voltage combination; Instantaneous capability of up to 10A.
  • Outputs: 2
  • Transformer: Electrostatically shielded 100VA R-core
  • Voltages: 5V, 7V, 9V, 12V
  • Dimensions: 9.0 inches wide x 9.1 inches deep x 3.3 inches tall (with feet).
  • Weight: 10.5 pounds
  • Warranty: 3-year parts and labor (excludes shipping costs after 90 days).

Overview

When I first gave the JS-2 a listen, I really enjoyed it. It didn’t draw too much attention to itself but I was satisfied with what I was hearing. This power supply is one of the more “energetic” and balanced ones in this comparison. It doesn’t try to tilt too heavily towards any specific sonic character. There’s great rhythm and brilliance across the entire spectrum.

On subsequent listens, the recurring theme was “Not bad at all. I like it.” The JS-2 has a good balance of all the technicals and doesn’t overdo or artificially hype anything. Details and texture are real-ish. And it’s a clean sound with good extension and a very broad soundstage.

I could hear what it was missing relative to the other supplies (mostly meatiness and articulation), but I think it has enough drama, power, and verity to please most ears. It’s not the smoothest or the most controlled, but it organically etches out some finer grain details. It also outperforms most of these power supplies in the treble region. Stringed instruments in particular have an abundance of air, sparkle, and speed. And notes are held with the right amount of sustain and intent.

Overall, the JS-2 is a fun and exuberant power supply. Its avidity produces vitality with a touch of gold. You’ll get a clean and transparent sound with a wide soundstage. Most importantly, it preserves the essence of the recording. This truthfulness is a rarity in many power supplies (and audio gear in general).

The Sound

Although the bass won’t split the floor open, the JS-2 is fast and punchy. It has appropriate cadence and confidence. Just enough to build an emotional connection to the music – and keep the listener engaged. The JS-2 is all about that free-spirited romance.

The soundstage is broader than it is deep. Meaning the frontal and back distances are closer together. Also, the spatial definition sits more in front of you than around you. You’re basically listening from a few rows back. Highlights aren’t glossy but have true texture and material. As such, the JS-2 is capable of beautifully reproducing the timing of reverbs and decay.

Just Right

The midrange is decently fleshed out – and is surrounded by collective bags of insight. It’s lucid but in a more informative and expressive way rather than being embellished.

Although aural shaping isn’t the JS-2’s best strength, it has better texturing and tonality than even the much pricier Sean Jacobs DC4. Resolution and air are also another nice quality. But above all, I think it reproduces treble very truthfully. Woodwinds and sopranos sound more like the real thing.

As far as tonality, the JS-2 doesn’t come off neutral or overly warm. More of a tepid tone – but still organic. Sometimes it sounds warm enough for my ears. And I’m glad it steers clear of being colorless and gray. It’s an enjoyable, even-handed tone that is luminous when needed.

Tradeoffs

The biggest drawback of the JS-2 is probably its lighter amount of fullness and body. It’s not a very meaty-sounding power supply. But it isn’t unbearably thin either. It’s just more lightfooted and tactile than it is tangible.

The JS-2 also doesn’t have razor-sharp delineation. You won’t get that precise, pinpoint imaging. But it’s far from sounding smeared. It still has a good balance of weight and provides enough musical connective tissue. When the track gets busy, however, the JS-2 does get a little soft and loses a bit of grip. It’s still able to convey the mood and momentum of the music very well. Just not as precisely.

Who Should Buy the UpTone Audio JS-2 Linear Power Supply?

Get this power supply if you enjoy a more uppity and fun power supply. It doesn’t have the most molded sound, but it’s transparent, organic-ish, and the tactility in the treble region is hugely addictive. Also for such a small power supply, dual-rail with four adjustable voltages, you get a lot of flexibility and value for your money.

Pros

Cons

  • Pairs nicely with the Qutest, but especially the RME ADI-2 DAC

  • A "believable" sound with soul and rawness.

  • Wide soundstage

  • Speedy and resolving

  • Elegant, compact, dual rail, adjustable power supply.

  • 5 Amps continuous from either output at any voltage.

  • Texture

    Great balance between resolution and body

    One of the quieter power supplies

    Accurate treble and vividness

    Decent tone - voices have a nice color to them.

  • Leaner sound, but there's still some meat there.

  • Transients aren't the crispiest

  • Not the most coherent, especially when the recording gets more complex. 

  • Not a liquid, analog sound. If you're into that.

  • Not a lot of sub-bass presence

  • Imaging isn't the most isolated

Comparisons

vs. Mojo Audio Illuminati v3

  • The JS-2 isn’t as analog sounding, but offers more shine and vibrancy.
  • The JS-2 is thinner and not nearly as dense as the Iluminati v3.
  • The JS-2 has more texture, transparency, and detail. Also tighter imaging.
  • The JS-2 has more grain and roughness while the Illuminati v3 is meatier and smoother.
  • JS-2 has more accurate treble but Illuminati has much beefier bass.

vs. Sean Jacobs DC4

  • The DC4 has far better separation and contouring.
  • DC4 layers out the music much better.
  • The DC4 is much smoother.
  • JS-2 is much quicker, cleaner, and more transparent.
  • JS-2 has a much larger soundstage.

vs. Paul Hynes SR7

  • The SR7 has far better separation and contouring.
  • SR7 layers out the music much better.
  • The JS-2 is leaner than the SR7. Not very dense.
  • JS-2 has much higher energy, good detail, and more accurate treble.
  • JS-2 has a larger soundstage.
  • JS-2 has more natural tone.
  • SR7 articulates the “fabric” of the music more granuarly.

vs. JCAT Optimo 3 Duo

  • The Optimo 3 Duo is darker and meatier.
  • Optimo has much better quality and more present bass.
  • JS-2 is more elevated and has truer top-end reproduction.

vs. Farad Super3

  • JS-2 has more dimension, depth, and a sound that will tickle you. The Super3 is slower and more compressed.
  • The Super3 is more balanced and doesn’t really overemphasize anything. The JS-2 is more fun and engaging – but is more aggressive.

vs. Plixir Elite BDC

  • These two have very good treble.
  • The Elite BDC has more detail while the JS-2 is more tangible.
  • The Elite BDC has a cooler tone.
  • You could hear the shape and dimensional space of the music more with the Elite BDC
  • Elite BDC has far better bass output. Both in weight and tightness.
  • JS-2 has a more natural tone in comparison. Which makes it enjoyable for most of the music I listen to (Hip hop, R&B, pop, acoustic).
  • JS-2 is meatier and more congealed.
  • Elite BDC has more inner resolution.

vs. Fidelizer Nikola2

  • The Fidelizer has truer tone.
  • The JS-2 skews towards the brighter and airy side

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Jay Luong

Mr. Audio Bacon himself. An open-minded electrical engineer and software developer by trade. I have an obsession with the enjoyment of all things media - specifically in the realm of music and film. So much heart and soul (and money) go into the creation of this artistry. My aim is to find out which products get me closer to what the musicians and directors intended.

View Comments

  • Well Jay, you have only just gone and done it again. Another mammoth review. Don’t you ever sleep!?

    As a Dave owner I was lucky to obtain the first production version of Sean Jacobs DC4 and have been using that ever since with a big grin on my face every time I use the Dave. It has possibly been the biggest improvement to the sound of my system (with the possible and honourable exception of my own Wave High Fidelity STORM dual BNC cables of course!).

    However all of that is about to change because Sean has been kind enough to loan me a prototype of his new ARC6 version of the DC4 power supply. Having had the Dave all this time I was not aware of any deficiencies. That was until I plugged in the ARC6. As you say in your review the DC4 is a master at revealing the texture of instruments but now the ARC6 version has a transient speed to go with that textural information. It is a quite uncanny combination. The bass is also deeper and more powerful and yet manages to more detail and information in it at the same time.

    You will gather that I like the ARC6 upgrade to the DC4 for the Dave. It is a huge upgrade to the Dc4. I understand that existing owners of the DC4 can have theirs upgraded to the ARC6 version by returning to Sean or to one of his agents in the USA or EU.

    But that is not really why I was minded to put pen to paper in response to your review. A few months ago I did my own private shoot out of power supplies powering the Qutest. These included the Sbooster with Ultra Mk2 upgrade, Farad Super3, Allo Shanti, MCRU, Sean Jacobs DC3, PowerAdd battery, iFi, a cheap LPS from China and of course, because I could, the 5V rail from a DC4. Broadly I agree with all your comments and in the end I used the Farad Super3, not because it was the best but because it was a reasonable amount of money to spend for the performance gain with a Qutest. One thing to say about the value for money Allo Shanti is that if one has the necessary skills it takes a leap forward in sound quality if the supplied captive leads are removed from the circuit board and GX16 sockets are installed allowing after market DC leads.

    I have more recently listened again to a DC4 powering the Qutest and although first time around I rejected the idea of a single rail £4,000 DC4 powering a £1.200 Qutest as being any where near a sensible decision I have now begun to wonder whether in fact it brings the £5,200 combination up to a level of similarly priced DACs and I think it might just do that. Such is the benefit of the DC4 with a Qutest.

    So, thanks once again for the huge undertaking and it is nice of course to see you still using my WAVE STREAM cables with your Dave. 👍

    Nick.

    • I would be curious to hear the ARC6! Is there a tonal color difference between DC4 and ARC6? More shine?

      I agree, the Farad Super3 is a great value, especially if you enjoy that more liquid and smooth sound. From memory, I thought the Mojo Illuminati V3 paired well with the Qutest. And I could definitely hear the potential of the Shanti, the price is incredible for its performance (but critical listeners won't be happy). GX16 sockets with custom cabling would be interesting.

      Have you tried batteries?

  • I run my RME ADI-2 fs DAC and streamer on pure LiFePo4 cells (without any battery management electronics of course). The DAC uses 4*3.2V 20AH cells in series, and the streamer 2 of the same in series. The batteries last more than a day so I charge at night when sleeping.

    It would be interesting to know how batteries like these compares to the better power supplies.

    • Yeah, I was thinking about including batteries as well. Which specific ones would you like to see?

      • I think the more "pure" cells you use the better, and not small AA or similar batteries. Here is the ones I use:
        https://shop.gwl.eu/LiFePO4-cells-3-2-V/LiFePO4-High-Power-Cell-3-2V-20Ah-Alu-case-CE.html

        Of if you want one ready made for RME DAC, this one works (its just 4 cells in series), should be similar available in NA if that's where you live: https://shop.gwl.eu/LiFeYPO4-batteries-12V-1-1/Lithium-Battery-LiFePO4-12V-20Ah.html

        But basically you want low internal resistance in combination with pure cells. For example, a power pack used for mobile phones sounds a lot worse (they have switched DC regulators inside to get to 5V).

        It also important to stay away from "battery management", even if you risk damaging the cells if overcharged or undercharged. Those battery managements are filled with switched cheap electronic.

        I then have 18 awg OCC coppar cables with cotton sleeves as only insulation, soldered to a DC connector of copper.

          • Yes, it is. I like the sound of my LiFePO4 batteries though, and LPS manufacturers often use batteries like those as "reference" to compare with (or so I have heard).

            It's also worth mentioning that Stromtank (a really expensive HiFi power gear) uses LiFePo4 cells for their "magic", but enough of them to also drive power amplifiers.

    • Not even a Contact Us email address. Doesn't infuse confidence unless you're inside Australi and can call them.

  • great work - thanks a million!!

    comment to the Sbooster PSU: i kind of relate to your findings (using mk 1 version), adding (now unavailable) Padis fuse and Furutech Absolute Power adds LIVE to it. yet, possibly also to all other PSUs tested here

  • Hi there,
    I know you cannot review everything under the sun, but I’ll selfishly propose you review the ISOL-8 Prometheus LPSU. Their power conditioners are great and I would be curious to see how their power supply compares with the others.

    Amazing amazing review; very well done! Thank you!

  • My Farad Super 3 is custom modified, but I think it performs very well. Along w/ Jay I am factoring in price and its incredibly diminutive size.

    I am also curious about the remarks in comparison to other PSUs, which cable was used: silver or copper?

    • Listening was primarily done with the copper cable. Still great for the price, especially if you enjoy a full bodied and smooth sound.

Recent Posts

Coco Lee: A Melody Unforgotten – Celebrating the Life and Legacy of an Iconic Star

In deeply unfortunate incident, Coco's life was tragically cut short, leaving behind a legacy… Read More

10 months ago

AXPONA 2023 – Show Report & Awards

After four long years of HiFi show drought, I'm excited to share my journey at… Read More

12 months ago

“Calypso King” Harry Belafonte Dies at Age 96

Harry Belafonte, music icon who broke down racial barriers with his unique blend of… Read More

12 months ago

Innuos PhoenixNET Review – Revolutionizing Digital Music

Innuos Design Philosophy In the realm of high-end audio, Innuos has made name for… Read More

1 year ago

CanJam SoCal 2022 – Quick Impressions

I know I've been MIA. Just had lot of personal things to take care… Read More

2 years ago

Meze Audio announces the official launch of the 109 PRO headphone

BAIA MARE, Romania – September 15, 2022 – Meze Audio, award-winning high-end headphone manufacturer, announces… Read More

2 years ago

This website uses cookies.