I try to attend at least one live performance a month – for enjoyment, and for a sanity check. There will be many mentions of “tonal accuracy.” My definition of tonal accuracy is how something sounds in the real world to me.
After many, many blind tests with other audiophiles, I understand not everyone hears or describes what they hear the same way. Our brain, at times, will play tricks on us.
The only way to do it right is to listen over time – at least a few days. What I consider “smooth” some will consider “warm” or “dense.” I also know many audiophiles who prefer an elevated tone, even though it doesn’t sound anything close to natural – but that’s OK. Anyway, I’ll do my best to describe what I hear.
I’ll be using the High Fidelity Cables CT-1 Ultimate power cord on the SR4 for this evaluation.
The most immediate differences between the LPS-1.2 and SR4 (at least with the CT-1U) is tone. The LPS-1.2 has a more warm-blooded and superbly organic tone. The SR4 is silkier and “cooler” in its overtones. As the cymbals come in, the SR4 is able to produce more nuanced and better metallic gradations while layering out the voice a little further back. The LPS-1.2 is more forward with a sweeter treble but more “blended” as far as depth and resolution.
When the taiko drums come pounding, both power supplies are explosive and punchy. There aren’t any signs of softness. The SR4 has more perceptible flex in the drum skin from the drumsticks bouncing off it whereas the LPS-1.2 has more growl and grandiose rumble – almost like a tubey bloom. The SR4 layers out the technical rhythm, dynamics, and transients more clearly while the LPS-1.2 is portrayed more holistically – keeping mostly the characteristically “musical” parts.
The SR4 has more dynamic extrusion into the listening room – while the LPS-1.2 stays warmer and closer together. It’s a little easier to perceive the size and shape of the drums with the SR4. The SR4 exhibits more balanced between the drums, gongs, cymbals – while there’s a slight low-end emphasis on the LPS-1.2.
Overall the SR4 is cleaner, smoother, and more nuanced while the LPS-1.2 has natural coloration and thump. Timbre is fantastic for both power supplies – you could still tell which instrument is what.
One of the strengths I mentioned in the Paul Hynes SR4 review was its uncanny ability to shape out the music. With the complex interactions between the crowd and players in this recording, the SR4 is surely strutting its stuff. The bass, drums, piano, and saxophone are not only separated and have well-formed outlines, but it’s also utterly convincing from an imaging standpoint.
The LPS-1.2 has wonderful coloration and tonal contrast while the SR4 has more dimensionality, texture, and palpable shape. During the bass and drum solos, you hear what’s being plucked and struck more clearly with the LPS-1.2 – while the SR4 demonstrates the complexities of how those instruments are being played. It articulates directionality, speed, and artistic strength and energy in a more visceral fashion.
Another track that makes this difference obvious is Hocus Pocus by Focus. The SR4 offers up a more holographic and coherent presentation. It feels like you’re watching a live show. The LPS-1.2, on the other hand, have instruments playing more forward on the same plane but has a more convincing tone – especially with the tires screeching and shouting.
The LPS-1.2’s lusher tone is cozy and inviting. The SR4’s technical ability provides a more 3D listening experience.
I think the warmblooded tonality of the LPS-1.2 sounds truer with this recording. Although the outlines of the LPS-1.2 are more “overlayed” rather than tight, they’re not bloomy, fuzzy, or rough. It still provides a richer atmosphere that compels rhymic head-bobs and toe-taps. Tonally, the LPS-1.2 will be considered more musical due to its more organic presentation. Once again, the SR4 is more performant in the technicalities -, especially with this specific power cord.
The SR4 exhibits better coherence, imaging, resolution, articulation, texture, quietness, and soundstage. The SR4 sounds holistically more convincing with its lifelike three-dimensional performers playing in front of you. Instead of just hearing the drum, you could hear how the drumsticks hit the drum. Instead of hearing a flat voice, you’re visualizing the emotion. You’re able to pinpoint the relative distances and size of Ms. Cassidy, strings, and percussions.
The SR4 is more of a listening experience whereas the LPS-1.2 is more about keeping things fun and intimate.
The LPS-1.2 still provides a more melodic and warmer tone that’s probably more aligned with the intimate atmosphere of this recording. Her voice, the audience, and piano sound true to life and have the proper color and grunt. If it isn’t clear by now, the LPS-1.2 is very musical out-of-the-box.
In comparison to the SR4, the LPS-1.2’s image seems to be painted on a flatter canvas. The LPS-1.2 has broader, more high-level strokes – you miss out on the details but you get the bigger picture – which isn’t a bad thing.
With the SR4, at around 3:25, Bareilles gets the crowd to whistle along. The piano key presses and holds have better transitional gradations. The whistle and laughter are also more nuanced and dimensional. There’s a better sense of textural envelopment – you feel as if you’re part of the audience whistling along. The SR4 also has a more coherent, dynamic, and less piecewise approach to imaging out the soundstage.
The LPS-1.2 colors the atmosphere for musicality but the SR4 does a better job with the lower level details.
I’ve already compared the SR4 with the SR7 in my previous review. With the SR7 at more than quadruple the price of the LPS-1.2 – it isn’t meant to be a fair comparison. But I know I’ll be asked about this, so here it is.
When used with the Vovox Textura power cord, the SR7 is in every way better than the SR4 and LPS-1.2. This includes dynamics, articulation, bass definition, soundstage, and body. My first thought when doing the comparison was “this sounds frickin’ real.”
As I play A Love Supreme Part II: Resolution by John Coltrane, with the SR7 you not only hear more of the music, but you also hear the skill involved with the music. The delicate nuances of cymbals, the vibrancy of piano notes, and brassy textural exertions. You’re immediately drawn in by the spacious yet controlled scene with supporting PRaT and coherence.
Long story short, the SR7 power supply is still in another league.
I’ve touched upon UpTone Audio’s LPS-1 and ISO REGEN more than a year ago. If you have the original UltraCap LPS-1, you should upgrade to the LPS-1.2. The LPS-1.2 is richer, smoother, and fuller in comparison. For lack of a better word, it’s more musical.
So, with the release of the UpTone Audio’s LPS-1.2, the choice between that and the Paul Hynes SR4 is made more difficult.
Which one you decide on depends on a few things.
The case for the UpTone Audio UltraCap LPS-1.2
The case for the Paul Hynes SR4
Everyone’s palate (and wallet) is different – so the choice is yours.
I’ve purchased at least four UltraCap LPS-1s last year – so the much improved LPS-1.2 comes with a high recommendation. The straight out the gate performance of the UltraCap LPS-1.2 is very compelling. Without spending more than $435, you’re getting great sound – in a small package.
The beauty is that you don’t need to buy a power conditioner or expensive power cord to get a rich musicality. Its raw and warmer character is also highly addictive and keeps you nodding with approval. It’s also the sleekest looking power supply on the planet.
Do you have experience with both the SR4 and LPS-1.2? Let me know your thoughts below.
Purchasing: UpTone Audio UltraCap LPS-1.2
Check out our SNEAK PEEKS on Facebook and Instagram!
Page: 1 2
Next-generation headphone developed with community feedback to deliver an even better listen and a stunning… Read More
TIDAL Audio, the world renowned manufacturer of luxury high-end audio speakers and electronics, is delighted… Read More
Treehaus Audiolab introduces new “Texture Black Metallic” finish at the Florida International Audio Expo 2024… Read More
As an audiophile constantly in pursuit of the pinnacle of sound quality, I've had the… Read More
HIFIMAN Debuts Two New Desktop DAC/Amps EF500 and EF499 Put HIFIMAN Design and Performance Within… Read More
The ULTIMA INTEGRATED is now available globally The British-made ULTIMA INTEGRATED is now in full… Read More
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
Jay,
out of curiosity. What's the logic behind a >$10k source and $1k speakers in your setup?. A the end of the day the speakers are the most important part of a system.
Great question. I agree that speakers are the most important part of the system. The reason is because I started with headphones. So I spent a lot of time perfecting the source. Now that I've transitioned to more 2-channel listening, I now have a wonderful "source foundation" for speaker reviews. I think I have at least 8 pairs in the review queue at the moment. Also, the ATC SCM7s sound GREAT and fit perfectly on my desk - where I do most of my listening. :)
ok, maybe as 'a transition to 2-channel' you could do another gigantic shoutout of near field monitors, as the new revel M126Be, full ranges, .. just asking ;.).
It's the only logical next step :) I'll put the Revel on my shortlist. Let me know if there are any other ones.
Maybe Elac Adante 🙂designe by andrew jones. It is coaxial driver for better near field listening
this answer makes me to salivate :-). Since typing is easy, here goes a list of suggestions of not too big monitors that I think are worthy:
-Revel M126Be
-Penaudio Cenya Signature
-Amphion Argon 3s
-Trenner & Friedl Art
-Voxatif Hagen (Full Range)
-Omega Super 3 High Output Monitor
-Omega Compact Alnico Monitor (Full Range)
-ATC SMC11
-Genelec 8341, 8331, 8340 (Actives)
-KEF LS50
-Proac Response DB1
Hello Cortes,
Most of those speakers have been out for years with multiple reviews behind them already. I would like to read about more recent ones like
Totem signature one
Sonus faber sonetto
Scansonic m5
Bowers 606
Mission Q2
...
Best regards
G
Easy to understand why you prefer a headphone/desktop setup, its far easier to A-B test with and less costly for resolution. I currently have HDPlex, SoTM SPS500, and an LPS 1.2 of which the LPS 1.2 is hands down best for powering small components like ISO Regen or a streamer that can work within the current limits of the LPS 1.2 I'd love to see your thoughts on ISO Regen powered by LPS 1.2 vs
TX-USB Ultra powered by your choice...
Definitely easier to swap things around and A/B test, but also because that's where I spend 8+ hours a day working on stuff. We're in the middle of setting up a few more listening rooms (budget and high-end) so we'll see how that goes.
I have no doubt the LPS-1.2 works well with the ISO Regen. Unfortunately, I no longer have an ISO Regen as I've found it no longer improved the sound when it's attached to the DAC or tX once the Innuos Zenith SE was in. However, it helped a lot with the SOtM Trifecta.
Actually no.
Garbage in - garbage out.
While the speakers have an important part in the overall sound, feeding a cheaper speaker with a top class source will always sound better than a cheap source into top class speakers.
As for the Uptone LPS 1.2, I plugged mine and ultraRendu into my system today to replace a MacMini.
My first listen didn't sound any better than the MacMini and I do have top class speakers :)
I was expecting a large difference is sound quality over the Mac and Mac but sorry, I'm not hearing it...
It's definitely not even in the same league as listening to Tidal vs. Spotify Premium...
Thanks for the reviews. Was the SR7 plugged into the power conditioner?
Digital audio is just SO damned sensitive. I am getting the best SQ at home I have ever had using the ultraRendu, but my system looks like a plate of speghetti!
I am VERY tempted by an SR7, but not if I have to use a power conditioner. On the other had a friend is selling his DCS Bridge and IF i sounds as good as the uR it would enable me to rremove two LPSUs and a LOAD of wire - which would be nice.
First world problems!
M
Both are good. I get a bit more 'air' with the LPS 1.2 into the uRendu. If you can run at 7V/1A off of the LPS 1.2, try charging it with the SR4 set at 9VDC (w should only get warm to the touch). Best of both worlds?
ATB
L.
Would also be interested in an Lps powering Lps1.2 scenario however the Sr4 in the above suggestion is not even close to making the lps 1.2 power requirements as has been highly discussed over at CA including Paul’s concerns himself.
If you do get around to it please make the suggested 36watt power requirement on the Lps 1.2 rather then introduce another under powering variable.
Hi Jay, much appreciated for the reviews ,it's always a reference for me . Could you tell me if the UpTone Audio UltraCap LPS-1.2 will work well with Sotm sms-200?
Yes, it'll complement it very well due to its intrinsic tone. Better than the LPS-1.
Happy days!Cheers Jay
Jay, I just bought the LPS 1.2 , should I use 9v or 12v ? (Have a good start 2019 ;)
Why did you use the Zenwave DC cable only for the SR4 instead of the Hynes copper one from the earlier review?
I prefer the sound of the Neotech 7N copper.
Understood. So why not you try Paul's silver cable? Paul's use of silver got a "this is the way to go" review at HiFi Pig (SR3, but not sure if it was the cable or internal wiring). In addition, a discussion with Paul will bring out that like you, he is a strong fan of warmth in audio, and makes use of annealed fine silver, which he finds neither bright nor emphasizing the high frequences.
Speaking of warmth in tone, I also found one can get a lot more than the Boomslang has to offer with PAD's Luminous Neptune. And maybe even more again, depending on the application, by adding iFi's SPDIF iPurifier at the end, fed by a good LPS instead of the stock adapter (the Boomslang also benefitted from this).
I just plugged the lps 1.2 into my Entreq power distributor and forgot about it.
Then read this review and compared plugging it into straight to the wall.
With Entreq (which doesn't do any filtering and no built in earth box either) the lps 1.2 with sms200ultra sounds bright.
Straight to the wall it sounds more natural.
Thanks for the suggestion.
My pleasure! Glad it worked out.